tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18671685.post114829409139144760..comments2023-11-02T14:12:24.693+00:00Comments on iSpecies: Why Google is good for science...maybeRoderic Pagehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00269598293846172649noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18671685.post-1148562128468376122006-05-25T14:02:00.000+01:002006-05-25T14:02:00.000+01:00ispecies is still running and getting results. Are...ispecies is still running and getting results. Are you displaying papers from Google Scholar from cashed results ? (the results look the same so I guess not :). Is there a reason why you don't get the papers from Pubmed ? Does Pubmed have the same limitations ?Pedro Beltraohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12177733941831975048noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18671685.post-1148327024785684972006-05-22T20:43:00.000+01:002006-05-22T20:43:00.000+01:00About LinkedIn, it seems that Nature/Connotea is a...About LinkedIn, it seems that Nature/Connotea is about to create a social (scientific) network called "Nature Network Boston". see <A HREF="http://blogs.nature.com/wp/nascent/2006/04/web_20_in_science.html" REL="nofollow">http://blogs.nature.com/wp/nascent/2006/04/web_20_in_science.html</A>...<BR/><BR/>Best<BR/><BR/>PierrePierre Lindenbaumhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13765837643388003852noreply@blogger.com